This is a very heated topic in some circles, and I may receive some backlash, but I felt it was an important topic to discuss. Is there a difference between magic and magick? Does adding the "k" really make a difference in the meaning? Should we even be using the "k?" Today I want to discuss these questions and explain why I do not use the "k" when talking about my magical workings.
According to some sources, the word "magick" is quite old, showing up in translations as early as 1651. However, as with most words in the English language, letters were later dropped with words such as shoppe becoming shop, olde becoming old, and magick becoming magic. It wasn't until the Victorian Period that the k was brought back by Aleister Crowley. During this period, mesmerism and spiritualism were captivating audiences across Europe, especially in England. Crowley added the k to differentiate between stage magic and magic used in witchcraft.Today, many witches still follow this practice, using magick to describe their craft and rituals while using magic to describe illusions and tricks. However, not everyone uses the k, and I am one of those witches, and for a good reason.
First off, say magic and magick aloud. Do you hear a difference? No, because they are pronounced the exact same way. In a conversation, how do you distinguish between the two? If you are talking to another pagan, they will use context clues to decipher which word you mean, but for those who are not practicing witches, the distinction isn't clear. You're not going to walk around saying "I practice magick with a 'k!'" either because, well, you'd sound pretentious and artificial. The distinction is only noticeable in written text like a book or blog, but is completely useless in conversation. Furthermore, by adding the k you run into linguistic issues with words such as magickian. Not an easily pronounceable word and the g would become a hard g like in the word ghost or goat.Try saying that aloud.
To add to this, the origins of the word "magick" are shady at best.While it has shown up in old English texts, words change over time. As I mentioned we don't spell shop with two p's and an e anymore. There is no reason to spell magic with a k. The fact that Crowley is the one who brought it back into use is a red flag for me and many others. The man made stuff up all the time and changed words without any regard to the rules of language construction or grammar. His works are filled with controversial material, a lot of which is untrue. I take everything he said with a grain of salt, including the use of the word magick.
I don't use the k for these reasons, and I believe it is time for us to reclaim a word that was already ours as we did with the word witch. Call stage magic illusions, but keep magic for what we do in the craft. If you are more comfortable using the k, that is perfectly fine. Use what you are most comfortable with. I know for some people, seeing the k is a mental queue to switch from the mundane to the spiritual. I personally do not use the k and will never use it.
Thanks for bringing this up. I don't use the K at the end of the word Magic because you can't hear the K. Glad I'm not the only one that doesn't do this pointless tradition.
ReplyDeleteAnd thank you for reading! I've noticed that more people are beginning to drop the k. I think it's antiquated.
DeleteInteresting conversation here, I see that there seems to be a little passion in it. I was looking more on a letter by letter basis and possibly a difference in meaning, literally, like my sons name that I put together and though I made up, it means man who walks a spiritual path - I thought that was cool, but each letter changed it slightly. I like the way Magik looks when it's written and want to put it in a sentence on a ring, but I wanted to see how much that changed the energy of the word. While this doesn't dive into that at all, it's interesting to see how people feel about the c vs the ck. Thanks for the post! Blessed Be
DeleteI don't use it, and even Find & Replace it out of any copied documents, because the grammarian in me hates it. If it becomes a verb and we start talking about "magicking," then yes, that would be correct, as it is in line with "panicking" and "picnicking." As a noun, though, it seems pretentious to me, even in writing.
ReplyDeleteI completely agree!
DeleteI disagree, it's easy to differentiate the two. To me you sound pretentious, by claiming it's even possible to reclaim a word that is quite heavily used in the mainstream to describe stage magic. I think it's a far fetched idea and adds to the confusion. I think it's better to educate people about magick and the difference. I would never call myself a magician because I do not perform illusions. Same as I would never try to call myself a magickian.
ReplyDeleteAnd that is perfectly fine. You are entitled to your opinion. However, there is absolutely NO way to differentiate between magic and magick when you are speaking. They sound exactly the same. Furthermore, Crowley made lots of things up and his claims can not be trusted. Magic is magic is magic. In fact, most witches and pagans use magic instead of magick in their writing. You can use whatever form you wish. I am going to stick to magic because it is what I prefer. Its not being pretentious to use the word I trust and connect with.
DeleteI have never used the word magick, it's a Crowleyism and I have never trusted his work or writings.
ReplyDeleteExactly! Thank you for reading.
DeleteI tried to bring this up in a friendly way to someone on instagram today and was brutally and passive aggressively shut down by a bunch of fake woke Insta-witches who even had the nerve to defend Crowley when I tried to kindly inform them of the fact that some of his works and statements are very sexist and even predatory. They completely invalidated me and even went so far as to say that it's ok to overlook a man's misogyny if he had a few good ideas. It makes me very sad for the state of spiritual discourse in this world and on social media in particular. There are so many people who like to form witchy cliques and invalidate others but so few who actually want to have real discourse and seek spiritual truth. The whole argument made me very sad and disheartened and like I'm less of a witch simply for having critical thinking skills. Social media makes everyone feel like they can act as an expert on everything without actually thinking or growing. It really makes me quite sad and I'm wondering if I'll ever get to talk to other witches who want to genuinely seek knowledge and not just treat magic like a fairytale ideal that is all sugar and spice. Thanks for writing this article, it let me know I'm not alone❤️
ReplyDeleteI'm sorry you had such an experience. I hope you recognize there are many of us witches out there just like you who are seeking real, authentic discourse. I've faced many of the same issues through the years, and some of the bloggers and groups I followed years ago, I no longer do for this exact reason. I don't claim to be an expert in anyway and I am always looking for books, articles, and people who have experiences and knowledge that I do not. That is how we grow, especially spiritually. Yes, Crowley had some good ideas, but the man was terrible, made stuff up, and based most of his practice on a book that was full of misinformation, lies, and bad science (The White Goddess by Robert Graves). I wish you the best of luck on your journey and I am thankful you found this blog post helpful and reassuring. Keep fighting the good fight, even when its difficult.
DeleteAn important thing to remember is that magic is magic and there is no such thing as good or bad magic, but for the purposes of color separation.marriage spell
ReplyDeleteVery true and I make sure not to label magic as good or bad. However, I'm not sure what you mean by "for the purposes of color separation." Are you referring to "black" and "white" magic? If so, those terms are rooted deeply in racism and fear-mongering and do no belong in witchcraft any longer. I'm a huge supporter than magic is magic is magic and that, even if you magic is different, doesn't make it bad or less effective than my own. Thank you for reading and commenting!
DeleteThank you for this clarification and also everyone's replies. This is the best explanation I have come across in much searching in the correct use of the term magic/magick and while I can appreciate both sides of the discussion, I am happy now with my decision to use 'magic' and not hesitate each time I write it.
ReplyDeleteI'm glad you enjoyed the article! I cannot support Crowley. He was an awful man...
DeleteI want to read but light grey on a white background isn't great for people with poor eyesight. Until I read this I will withhold my "k"s.
ReplyDeleteI'm sorry. You should be able to highlight and change your page view settings to darken the font.
Delete